All
AllPLLa Liga4 more
All
HomePlayersTeamsFixtures
AllPLLa LigaSerie ABundesligaLigue 1Championship
HomePlayersTeamsFixtures
xG Stat

Pick smarter, every gameweek.

Resources
  • Guide
  • Contact & FAQ
  • Pricing
  • FPL strategy guide
  • Rate my FPL team
  • AI assistants
Legal
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Delete account
xG Stat
Home
Fixtures
Players
Teams
All
La Liga
Home
Players
Teams
Fixtures
My FPL
Sign InSign Up
All
La Liga
Serie A
Bundesliga
Ligue 1
Championship
Home
Players
Teams
Fixtures
My FPL
StatsScoutingCompareRun Finder
StatsScoutingCompareFixture Advantage Finder
xG Stat
Home
My FPL
Fixtures
Players
Teams

Compare Premier League players 2026-27

Compare2 of 5
See on charts
M. van Ewijkv. EwijkCoventry City · Fullback · #44 full-back5.5
C. RichardsRichardsCrystal Palace · Centre-back · #38 centre-back5.8
M. van Ewijkvan EwijkCoventry City
C. RichardsRichardsCrystal Palace
M. van Ewijkvan EwijkCoventry City
C. RichardsRichardsCrystal Palace
Ratingseason
5.5
5.8
Ratingseason
5.5
5.8
Goal threatxG/90
0.00
2026-27 Premier League so far

1 Pro category is locked and not counted.

Head to head

Defending

Full report: v. Ewijk · Richards

Passing and progression

Full report: v. Ewijk · Richards

Creativity

Full report: v. Ewijk · Richards

Goal threat

Full report: v. Ewijk · Richards

Reliability

FPL selection

Last 5 matches

Goals + assists, xG + xA beneath. Oldest to newest
PlayerLatestTotal
v. Ewijk00.0000.0000.0000.2000.0200.22
Richards00.0000.00

Minutes played

M. van Ewijk
v. EwijkEver-present
95%
C. Richards
RichardsEver-present
100%

Set-piece duties

Fantasy value & returns

M. van Ewijk
v. Ewijk
Fullback
15
Pts
Per game
2.1
Bonus
0
Price
£3.9m
Pts per £m
3.8
Ownership7.2%
C. Richards
Richards
Centre-back
23
Pts
Per game
2.9
Bonus
0
Price
£4.9m
Pts per £m
4.7
Ownership0.6%

All stats

PlayerTeamMinsStart %GAG+AxGxAxGIGoalsvs xG
v. Ewijkv. Ewijk
Coventry City logoCOV682100%0000.00.30.3-0.0
RichardsRichards
Crystal Palace logoCRY789100%0000.40.00.5-0.4

New to these numbers? Mins, xG, xA, xGI, Goals vs xG explained in plain English.

v. Ewijk
Richards
0.05
Goal threatxG/90
0.00
0.05
CreationxA/90
0.03
0.00
CreationxA/90
0.03
0.00
Recent formG+A, last 5
0
0
Recent formG+A, last 5
0
0
Dependabilityof minutes
95%
100%
Dependabilityof minutes
95%
100%
Defendingactions/90
9.9
13.3
Defendingactions/90
9.9
13.3
ThreatxT/90
ThreatxT/90
00.18
00.01
00.00
00.19

Next 5 fixtures

Each player's chance in each of his next five fixtures.
PlayerPENCORFK
M. van Ewijk
v. Ewijk
C. Richards
Richards

Discipline

Player
FoulsWon
M. van Ewijk
v. Ewijk
2055
C. Richards
Richards
1051

Player profile

Fullback profile

Fullback profilePercentile radar of M. van Ewijk and C. Richards across 10 measures: DEF. DUELS %, 1V1 WON %, INTERCEPTIONS, AERIALS WON, PROG. PASSES, PROG. RUNS, CROSSES, DRIBBLES, xA, BOX TOUCHES.medianDEF. DUELS %1V1 WON %INTERCEPTIONSAERIALS WONPROG. PASSESPROG. RUNSCROSSESDRIBBLESxABOX TOUCHESDEF. DUELS %1V1 WON %INTERCEPTIONSAERIALS WONPROG. PASSESPROG. RUNSCROSSESDRIBBLESxABOX TOUCHES
  • M. van Ewijk
  • C. Richards
Per 90, ranked against EPL fullbacks, 26/27, each player ranked against their own position. Defensive counts are raw, not adjusted for possession.

Where they sit

each axis of the radar, one at a time

Def. duels %

Defensive duels won
◀ BeatenavgWins the duel ▶
M. van Ewijk
v. Ewijk
48.0%
C. Richards
Richards
62.7%

1v1 won %

Dribblers stopped
◀ Dribbled pastavgStops the dribbler ▶
M. van Ewijk
v. Ewijk
30.4%
C. Richards
Richards
46.2%

Interceptions

Interceptions per 90
◀ ReactiveavgReads it ▶
M. van Ewijk
v. Ewijk
5.28
C. Richards
Richards
6.62

Aerials won

Aerial duels won per 90
◀ GroundedavgTarget man ▶
M. van Ewijk
v. Ewijk
1.45
C. Richards
Richards
1.83

Prog. passes

Progressive passes per 90
◀ HoldsavgMoves it forward ▶
M. van Ewijk
v. Ewijk
5.41
C. Richards
Richards
5.48

Prog. runs

Progressive runs per 90
◀ Passes itavgCarries it ▶
M. van Ewijk
v. Ewijk
1.32
C. Richards
Richards
0.23

Next 5 fixtures

Clean sheet chance in each fixture. Tiles coloured by opponent difficulty, greener is kinder.

Best placed for the next five:

M. van EwijkNailed on
SUNH34%
EVEA
CRYH
LEEA
IPSH
Avg
C. RichardsNailed on
TOTA22%
LIVH
COVA
HULH
CHEA
Avg

Model estimate from shot-level data, opponent profile and minutes. Track record: see how xG called it