Brighton vs Fulham Preview: What the xG Data Says

This match has been played.

See full analysis

Pre-Match Signals

BRI concede disproportionate xG through their right side, exactly where FUL focus their attacks

FavoursFULSubscribers see the evidence behind this

Neither side keeps clean sheets regularly (17% and 0%). Both create enough chances to score

Subscribers see the evidence behind this

Brighton

Last 10 home games4W · 4D · 2L · 40% wins

Solid form (solid defence)

1.5 goals per game (xG expected: 1.4)

On track

1.0 conceded per game (xGA expected: 1.6)

Outperforming

Fulham

Last 10 away games3W · 1D · 6L · 30% wins

Solid form

1.2 goals per game (xG expected: 1.3)

On track

1.8 conceded per game (xGA expected: 1.8)

On track

Player
Muniz FUL	0.63	0.58	3.06	81
S. Rowe FUL	0.54	0.52	3.13	-
Bobb FUL	0.72	0.32	0.73	-

26 more players, opponent-adjusted columns and last-6 trendsSign Up

Tactical Analysis

How these teams play and where the match could be decided

Possession-based ↔ Direct

Low Block ↔ High Press

Conservative ↔ Risk-taking

Central Play ↔ Wide Play

Scrappy ↔ Technical

Light ↔ Physically Dominant

Sit Off ↔ Counter-Press

Low Intensity ↔ High Intensity

Brighton

Fulham

Least vulnerable Average Most vulnerable

BRI(38 matches)

Σ GI

CAM

CDM

2.42

0.6810th

0.377th

0.379th

0.1116th

0.2611th

0.139th

0.183rd

0.1311th

0.183rd

FUL(38 matches)

Σ GI

CAM

CDM

2.29

0.748th

0.2911th

0.3213th

0.295th

0.1813th

0.1115th

0.185th

0.0816th

0.1113th

GI = Goals + Assists / matchxG = Expected Goals / matchxT = Expected Threat / match

Did the channel advantage actually produce chances?

Did both teams find the net as expected?

Come back after the final whistle.

BrightonBrighton
1-1
FulhamFulham
Ferguson 25'

Pre-Match Signals

Venue Form

Players who decide this

FUL

FUL

FUL

Tactical Analysis

Style and key characteristics

Intensity, discipline, and resilience

Attacking Zones

Position vs Expected Position

Form & Head-to-head

Style and key characteristics

Positional Vulnerabilities

Questions for after full-time

Intensity, discipline, and resilience

Players who decide this

FUL

FUL

FUL

Pre-Match Signals

Venue Form

Players who decide this

FUL

FUL

FUL

Tactical Analysis

Style and key characteristics

Intensity, discipline, and resilience

Attacking Zones

Style and key characteristics

Positional Vulnerabilities

Questions for after full-time

Fulham formWLWLL

Head-to-head · last 5

Intensity, discipline, and resilience

Players who decide this

FUL

FUL

FUL