Which teams' results will hold, and which won't?
This table separates sustainable performance from luck, using chance quality and volume.
| Defensive Solidity | Pressing Efficiency | Duels & Aerial Dominance | Recovery & Counter-Pressing | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manchester City | 4 | 3.1 | 2 | 3 | 40 | 10.42 | 110 | 55% | 53% | 114 | 28 | |
| Arsenal | 4 | 3.4 | 1 | 3 | 35 | 12.45 | 75 | 46% | 58% | 116 | 21 | |
| Liverpool | 4 | 4.7 | 4 | 2 | 47 | 8.02 | 143 | 52% | 51% | 153 | 25 | |
| Bournemouth | 4 | 5.0 | 7 | 0 | 38 | 12.70 | 98 | 57% | 52% | 145 | 19 | |
| Leeds Utd | 4 | 5.2 | 3 | 1 | 54 | 12.04 | 119 | 55% | 47% | 209 | 45 | |
| Manchester Utd | 4 | 5.5 | 7 | 0 | 39 | 11.36 | 111 | 55% | 52% | 129 | 21 | |
| Sunderland | 4 | 5.5 | 5 | 1 | 40 | 9.86 | 111 | 54% | 51% | 161 | 25 | |
| Nottingham Forest | 4 | 5.6 | 4 | 1 | 41 | 13.20 | 88 | 56% | 53% | 183 | 24 | |
| Hull City | 4 | 5.9 | 2 | 3 | 54 | 19.12 | 81 | 53% | 53% | 207 | 21 | |
| Everton | 4 | 6.0 | 3 | 2 | 56 | 15.19 | 98 | 56% | 54% | 168 | 27 | |
| Fulham | 4 | 7.1 | 7 | 1 | 50 | 12.17 | 118 | 50% | 42% | 154 | 28 | |
| Aston Villa | 4 | 7.2 | 7 | 1 | 57 | 16.73 | 77 | 54% | 43% | 130 | 23 | |
| Brentford | 5 | 7.3 | 4 | 2 | 65 | 10.90 | 149 | 53% | 53% | 218 | 36 | |
| Coventry City | 4 | 8.5 | 10 | 0 | 62 | 21.13 | 106 | 43% | 53% | 148 | 30 | |
| Brighton | 4 | 8.6 | 5 | 2 | 42 | 5.88 | 130 | 49% | 51% | 121 | 23 | |
| Tottenham | 4 | 8.9 | 5 | 2 | 56 | 9.29 | 104 | 48% | 36% | 145 | 26 | |
| Newcastle Utd | 4 | 9.0 | 8 | 1 | 75 | 9.73 | 86 | 45% | 51% | 181 | 38 | |
| Ipswich Town | 4 | 9.0 | 10 | 0 | 61 | 14.39 | 87 | 50% | 50% | 166 | 36 | |
| Chelsea | 5 | 10.6 | 12 | 0 | 71 | 15.48 | 139 | 61% | 50% | 196 | 35 | |
| Crystal Palace | 4 | 10.8 | 11 | 0 | 64 | 18.70 | 101 | 58% | 44% | 175 | 36 | |
